Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
It occurred to me that while I have plenty of T5577-based cards, only few of them show up as such during `lf search`.
Looking at the source code for this part, I see that `P1Detect()` is called to test for T55xx. Indeed, `lf t55xx p1detect` is much less reliable than `lf t55xx detect`.
Is it just for me? What was the ground for decision to use `p1detect` instead of `detect`? Should it be amended?
Update: figured out why p1detect is unreliable. It wants manufacturer ID in traceability info to be "ATMEL France", while most of my cards are Chinese clones and have "Silicon Craft Technology Thailand".