Proxmark3 community

Akerw

Contributor

Registered: 2021-10-12

Posts: 8

ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

So I pulled master and compiled, flashed with pm-3-flash-all
My client version, "os" version is different, and FPGA date is still much older.

-Is that ok ?
-would I be warned if this was bad?
-or do I need to manually download & flash something more?

 [ CLIENT ]
  RRG/Iceman/master/v4.13441-1046-gfe75de744 2021-10-13 19:22:04
  compiled with............. GCC 10.3.0
  platform.................. Linux / x86_64

 bootrom: RRG/Iceman/master/v4.13441-968-gbac58d2a6 2021-09-07 14:57:37
       os: RRG/Iceman/master/v4.13441-968-gbac58d2a6 2021-09-07 14:57:43
  compiled with GCC 6.3.1 20170620 (release) [ARM/embedded-6-branch revision 249437]

 [ FPGA ] 
  LF image built for 2s30vq100 on 2020-07-08 at 23:08:07
  HF image built for 2s30vq100 on 2020-07-08 at 23:08:19
  HF FeliCa image built for 2s30vq100 on 2020-07-08 at 23:08:30

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

nothing to worry about,    but its not the latest release.
When you compile,  make sure you clean first.

make clean
make -j
./pm3-flash-all
./pm3

Akerw

Contributor

Registered: 2021-10-12

Posts: 8

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Thank you, now the client and ARM versions are the same.

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Still the FPGA version is same , it is not getting updated .

I am trying to debug the communication between ARM and FPGA  in Ubuntu using VSCode.  I tried to add the debug_arm =1 in makefile.platform  and makefiles.def too,but there is no success.  Please let me know how can i debug the communication between FPGA and arm.

Last edited by sampurna (2022-03-23 09:31:59)

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

since you are not building the fpga images,  and the rarely changes,   it will look like that.

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Please let me know how to build fpga images .I found below reference document . Does it still hold good ? 
http://www.proxmark.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=607

Last edited by sampurna (2022-03-24 09:46:55)

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

You need the xilinix build chain.  once you got that, its just to run make

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Hi @Iceman, I installed xilink webpack10.1 and tried to run makefile present in fpga-xc2s30 folder ,still unable to build it

I have two questions .

1) Whether my xilink tool chain version is correct ?
2) Whether i am running the correct make file  to build the FPGA.

Last edited by sampurna (2022-03-25 06:29:38)

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

I am not sure how to answer any of your questions.  All of them are missing context.

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Hi @iceman , I would like to build FPGA component .So as per previous suggestion  "You need the xilinix build chain.  once you got that, its just to run make"

I installed ISE webpack(10.1) XiLInx tool chain and tried to run the  makefile present in fpga-xc2s30 folder ( I have taken the latest repo from git). Still  not able to build FPGA.

So wanted to confirm whether ISE Webpack (10.1) is the right tool chain to be used or not ,as well as the  Makefile present in fpga-xc2s30 is the right make file or not.

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

I can't help you.  Good luck!

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Thanks @iceman i am able to build the FPGA module .

Here is the link for the ISE Webpack .  https://www.xilinx.com/member/10x_and_prior_regids.html. I installed "ISE Foundation". Then we need to source the Settings64.sh. After that we can run the "make"command from the FPGA location .

@ iceman , is there any plan to upgrade the FPGA component , it is quite old one .

Last edited by sampurna (2022-03-28 07:30:35)

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Another question , Now i am separately building the FPGA and then client by giving  "make clean && make all ". is there any way to build all the modules arm,fpga and client simultaneously .

iceman

Administrator

Registered: 2013-04-25

Posts: 9,468

Website

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Good thing you managed to configure your build chain and compile the fpga images.

What do you do with:

settings64.sh

How to compile everything in a go?   Why not do like this

make clean; cd fpga; make -j; cd ..; make -j; ./pm3-flash-all; ./pm3

sampurna

Contributor

Registered: 2022-02-19

Posts: 16

Email

Re: ARM version vs client version vs FPGA version...

Thanks @iceman  for the information . I simply  sourcing the settings64.sh , right now i am not changing any thing in settings64.sh . Then running the make file of FPGA ie present in fpga_xc2s30 folder. Let me know if you have any other way to do it . Please consider me as a novice.
By doing this libstdc++.so.6 default reference path is becoming junk after building FPGA, again i am reloading it properly to build other component.

$ souce opt/Xilinx/10.1/ise/settings64.sh

Last edited by sampurna (2022-03-29 05:37:17)