Proxmark3 community
Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.
Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.
"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia
- Logged in as ikarus
- Last visit: Today 11:22:42
- Topics: Posted | New | Active | Unanswered
Announcement
Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord
Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.
Pages: 1
#1 2009-08-23 15:14:32
NXP Proposed Counter-measures
Trying to read up on the counter-measures that can be implemented in order to somehow protect against the Mifare vulnerablities, i found out that nxp issued some directions but they are under disclosure. Anyone has any idea generally in what direction they are moving concerning their proposals? Are they only targeting the infrastructure at the backbone of the systems?
#2 2009-08-23 17:01:28
- rule
- Member
- Registered: 2008-05-21
- Posts: 417
Re: NXP Proposed Counter-measures
From what I understand you mean these documents
Maybe someone could drop them into the upload directory of the files section.
I will move them to the corresponding MIFARE Classic section 
#3 2009-08-24 01:44:40
- olesmartie
- Member
- Registered: 2009-06-25
- Posts: 3
Re: NXP Proposed Counter-measures
Think you are looking for:
Application Note AN 155010 1 June 2008
Application Note 155110 20 June 2008
Application Note 155120 4 December 2008
Application Note 155121 16 February 2009
Each one issued as a new method of hacking the cards was published.
They do not offer any real viable solutions to the maor security problems with these cards. In many cases the NXP-developed solutions are over-complicated and rely a lot on back-end system montoring and detection, which never really works in practice.
