Proxmark3 community

Research, development and trades concerning the powerful Proxmark3 device.

Remember; sharing is caring. Bring something back to the community.


"Learn the tools of the trade the hard way." +Fravia

  • Logged in as ikarus
  • Last visit: Today 11:22:42

Announcement

Time changes and with it the technology
Proxmark3 @ discord

Users of this forum, please be aware that information stored on this site is not private.

#1 2009-07-13 22:07:52

ryan
Contributor
Registered: 2009-06-17
Posts: 36

New tune Command Output

I decided to try the new tune command on my antenna, and I got some unexpected results.

>> Started prox, built Jul 13 2009 15:43:22
 Connected to device
> tune


# LF antenna: 37.73 V @   125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 30.35 V @   134.00 kHz
# LF optimal:  0.23 V @     9.42 kHz
# HF antenna:  7.48 V @    13.56 MHz
# Your LF antenna is unusable.

The voltages seem to be ok, and I can read HID proxcards (only thing i have handy to test with at the moment) from about 2 inches away.  Is my antenna really that bad?  Am I missing something?

-ryan

Offline

#2 2009-07-14 14:42:07

ryan
Contributor
Registered: 2009-06-17
Posts: 36

Re: New tune Command Output

So for some reason, now my output seems better.  I don't think I changed anything that would have affected the operation of the antenna.

# LF antenna: 33.17 V @   125.00 kHz
# LF antenna: 41.89 V @   134.00 kHz
# LF optimal: 41.76 V @   127.66 kHz
# HF antenna:  7.48 V @    13.56 MHz

I have no explanation for the change in output.  For now I'll just blame sunspots.

-ryan

Offline

#3 2009-07-14 15:11:03

adam@algroup.co.uk
Contributor
From: UK
Registered: 2009-05-01
Posts: 203
Website

Re: New tune Command Output

If you hadn't flashed the PM3 with the new firmware when you first ran it that would have produced weird results.

Offline

#4 2009-07-14 15:15:16

ryan
Contributor
Registered: 2009-06-17
Posts: 36

Re: New tune Command Output

I thought I had flashed it before, but maybe I gave it the wrong osimage.  I did rerun svn update and reflashed the pm3 between the weird results and the expected results, so that must have been it.

Thanks!

Offline

Quick reply

Write your message and submit

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB